All
Filter by:
How do I deposit cash into my account?
I need help with account verification
Why can't I access my account?
Are there any crypto withdrawal fees?
I need help signing into my account
This guide walks through introducing approval requirements one workflow at a time. The system is designed for incremental adoption: your Organization starts fast, with the Owner able to do everything alone, and you tighten each workflow when you are ready, ending, if you choose, with a setup where no single person can move funds or change the rules unaided.
For the mechanics of policies, see Policies, approvals, and governance. For the access model, see Roles, profiles, and permissions.
The Execute level and the “Always require approval” setting combine into two postures:
Different workflows can hold different postures. A common shape: approvals for everyone on Withdrawal Request, a fast path on Transfer Request (funds stay inside the Organization), and approvals on Manage Policies to protect the rules themselves.
The first three steps are freely reversible. Locking is the commitment.
Step 1 - Bootstrap
The Owner starts with the system-defined Admin profile and Full access role: Execute on every workflow, every permission on every account. Every workflow’s policy starts open. As a single-user Organization, you operate exactly as before, nothing waits for approval, because there is no one to approve.
Step 2 - Configure
Build the approval setup for one workflow, typically Withdrawal Request first, while “Always require approval” stays OFF:
Nothing is enforced yet. You retain Execute and continue working normally while the pieces go into place.
Step 3 - Validate
Turn “Always require approval” ON for the target workflow. Every request, including yours, now queues. Verify with live requests:
This is the safe window: governance is in effect, but the policy is not locked, so you can turn the setting OFF, adjust, and try again as often as needed. Decide whether the final posture should keep “Always require approval” ON or turn it OFF before you lock the policy.
Step 4 - Lock
Lock the policy. Locking is itself a Manage Policies request: if Manage Policies already requires approval, the lock takes effect once another Member approves it. From this point:
Locking removes any one person’s ability to weaken governance on this workflow. Future changes, including unlocking, depend on an independent approver remaining available through Manage Policies. Keep approver coverage in mind when Members change roles or leave.
Step 5 - Repeat
Every other workflow keeps its current posture until you return to Step 2 for it. Any mix of governed and ungoverned workflows is a valid steady state, the progression is a recommendation, not a requirement.
The final step - lock Manage Policies itself
Manage Policies has its own policy and its own lock. Locking it is the end state of the rollout: from then on, every rule change anywhere in the Organization, policy settings, locks, and unlocks, on every workflow, requires independent approval, and no single person can loosen governance again through the product.
Take this step last, once every workflow you intend to govern is configured and locked, and confirm at least two Members hold Approve on Manage Policies first, locked policies stay changeable only while independent approvers remain available. See Policies, approvals, and governance for how this lock behaves.
A CFO wants to complete withdrawals immediately herself while every withdrawal from the fund managers goes through her review.
Workflow Profiles:
Member | Profile | Withdrawal Request levels |
|---|---|---|
CFO | Custom “CFO” | View, Initiate, Approve, Execute |
Fund Manager A | Initiator (system-defined) | View, Initiate |
Fund Manager B | Initiator (system-defined) | View, Initiate |
All three hold an Account Role granting Withdraw on the operating accounts. The levels in this example describe Withdrawal Request only. The system-defined Initiator profile also grants Initiate on every other workflow. Use a custom profile if the fund managers should initiate withdrawals but not other governed operations.
Withdrawal Request policy: required approvals 1, “Always require approval” OFF, policy locked.
The result: the CFO’s withdrawals complete immediately through Execute. Each fund manager’s withdrawal waits for one approval, in practice, the CFO’s, since she is the only approver. Nobody can change these rules alone, because the policy is locked.
Before locking, another Member must also hold Approve on Manage Policies. That Member independently approves future policy changes and unlock requests.
Tightening later. When the firm decides all withdrawals, including the CFO’s, need review, the change goes through a policy request (independent approval required, since the policy is locked):
The CFO’s Execute stays on her profile, dormant. If the firm ever relaxes the policy again, her fast path resumes without anyone re-assigning access.
A four-person team on the Withdrawal Request workflow, showing how approval eligibility resolves per request:
Member | View | Initiate | Approve | Execute |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Owner | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Alice | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
Bob | Yes | - | Yes | - |
Charlie | Yes | Yes | - | - |
Policy: required approvals 2, “Always require approval” ON (so the Owner’s Execute is dormant).
Scenario | Who must approve | Why |
|---|---|---|
Owner initiates | Alice and Bob | The Owner is excluded from approving their own request; Alice and Bob are the only other approvers, so both are needed. |
Alice initiates | Owner and Bob | Alice is excluded; the remaining approvers are the Owner and Bob. |
Charlie initiates | Any 2 of Owner, Alice, Bob | Charlie holds no Approve, so all three approvers are eligible for his requests. |
Bob initiates | - | Bob holds no Initiate; he cannot create withdrawal requests. He reviews, a pure-approver position many teams use deliberately. |